If you can't post any links to posts in this thread where you claim I have asked anyone to prove anything then it is totally reasonable for anyone to conclude that you are the one actually telling lies here.
As I posted earlier this thread, this thread is also being discussed elsewhere and people over at dpr are laughing at what is going on here.
Sorry, I'm out of superlatives... Though I'm not sure I've actually done anything other than question your method and/or statements.
Not surprised, I'm sure they're laughing here as well. So I'm going to step back, as graciously as the baying crowd will allow...
That's fine .
People are making up their own minds on your honesty and integrity based on your inability to post links to any of my posts where you claim I have asked anyone to prove their claims about what happened to them at dpr or where you claim I have called anyone a liar.
So nothing has changed and I will continue to scrutinise unsubstantiated claims as everyone is entitled to do.
Maybe that unsubstantiated claim is true, or maybe it isn't. There's no way to know without proof.
That is exactly correct.
But the difference here is, as I posted earlier when the same comment was made, that it is totally irrelevant to me whether anyone believes or not any unsubstantiated comments I make because it makes no difference at all to anything.
If people don't believe this thread is being laughed at at dpr, that's fine because it is their choice to make and nothing changes.
Yes, I don't understand why anyone here should care what you claim to believe or not believe. That's of no importance at all.
Exactly!!!! 😀
As I posted earlier, I am providing balance to an otherwise very one sided thread by posting how I see things here.
Totally unsubstantiated claim. Where's your link?
Asked and answered a few posts back.
Oh my dear God, we are at the pantomime.
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
"Oh yes he did" . "Oh no he didn't"
................................................................... on to infinity
If only it was that simple!
The pantomime just needs a better title than "DPR Moderators Still At It".
A few that have been suggested to me are:
I like #2 the most so far 😀
How about "DanHasLeftForum Still At It"...
Tim
Added to the list 👍
5 . "DanHasLeftForum Still At It"
I've said it before - if people just ignored him, he would go away.
You are just pandering to his whims.
Let's hope they listen to you this time and ignore DanHasLeftForum 🙂
But it appears a few here cannot cope with the undeniable fact that no-one is under any obligation to blindly accept unsubstantiated statements and that DanHasLeftForum and other members are entitled to scrutinise and post opinions if unsubstantiated statements are made in the future.
It's about providing balance in an otherwise very one sided thread.
This is the updated list of title suggestions for NCV's pantomime.
Hi,
I agree. Perfect.
I don't pay a whole lot of attention to this thread. Just once in a while. And always only the last page. And here this post is. Saying exactly what I was thinking. Ha!
So, I just had to post and say so. So, I'll now go back to ignoring it for a few days.
But, I will take this opportunity to say this is why there is a 150 post limit elsewhere. From back in the early days. Too bad we don't have a limit here.
Stan
