It's not negative criticism, but to my eye we are dealing with some purple rendition in most pictures, alas. A bit distracting, but your subject is certainly very appealing and interesting. My fave is the shot (#5) with steps in the middle. Great scenery.
B&w renditions are also very engaging.
I just wonder if this is maybe Fuji colour interpretation rather than pp.
The purple may be ON1 Photo Raw doing it's stuff when you do the AI Brilliance. I noticed it didn't look quite right, but I still liked it. NUmbers 1,4, 5 and 6 are the ones I think. Which did you see it in?
Well, slight purple tinge is visible, to me. Maybe it's a Fuji colour signature, or Provia simulator?! Short of comparison with your team mates cameras I am at a loss...
Still, I vote for #5!!!
Silkypix shows me original white balance near daylight (5417K) + lot of purple tint (15 - I don't know units, but usually color shift is 2 or 3).
I made two versions - full auto adjustment (7457K! + whatever adjustments Silkypix does) and cloudy (6000K) without purple, without dynamic adjustments and without film simulation. Sorry about resolution - I just was interested in colours.
Maybe it was unusual lighting this day and your camera picked it up not that correctly? Of course I can't know, do Silkypix colours looke more natural or not - I was not there :)
Or it was just the light - your #4 shows sunset(?) and clouds, which can be the reason. For that 0139 image I can guess that camera decided to make sky color right - in your original it is certainly more beliveable than in Silkypix auto-adjusted version (sky is a bit yellowish there).
I also are not against the purplish tint - it's just interesting, what could cause that.
I installed silkypix - the fuji raw converter version - and loaded in that file. I immediately saw what you meant about the colour offset of 15. Set it to zero and it looked much nicer.
BUT - I get an error "Cannot write in this folder. Specify another folder." message 5407 when I try and 'develop' anything. Any idea what that means? I've tried loads of folders and always get the same error.
[edit - never mind, it was Windows Security kicking in]
Thanks, but all the original files I posted were taken from the raw. But if the s/w uses the film simulation as a base, then it will carry forward the purple (actually Magenta) and use it to create the JPGs.
Alan
Yes, though when enlarged, the bluishness is less objectionable..
I downloaded your raw file and looked at it in Photolab. I cannot see any significant difference to the colours. I used to have this problem with similar analog photos on overcast days in the north of England (e.g. Ilkley moor) and had to use a filter to avoid it. I suggest that next time in similar circumstances you take a photo of a grey card (or white shirt or handkerchief!) And use that as a reference for colour temperature correction. This is easily done in PL, but I dont know how in other software. (Photoshop "Auto Colour" did not improve it.)
On another matter, the resolution of your raw file when it arrived here was much worse than the OOC jpeg you have posted. This is most obvious looking at the gate in the middle of the picture. On the RAF file it looks quite blurred by comparison. Odd!
I don't see why it should be just because it's overcast or unless someone uses sooc jpegs where the white balance is baked into the jpeg's rgb data. If shooting raw the white balance is set manually to whatever you like in the raw converter app without being limited to the fixed options in the camera.
In Alan's case it seems one of the default settings in his raw converter, as described earlier, is causing his color cast issue.
This is a quick and basic raw conversion of Alan's raw file using PSE's ACR. I don't see any colour cast on my screen.
I would think all reputable raw converters have a white balance tool.
In the absence of using a grey card, a quick way of setting at least a good white balance starting point is to use the white balance tool to click on something that is supposed to be a neutral colour (r=g=b) in the scene.
The lighter the neutral colour the better as it is more likely to be less noisy than a dark neutral color because of the relatively larger amount of light recorded by the sensor for that part of the scene.