• Aug. 10, 2023, 5:23 p.m.

    Long story short:

    Holidays, I generally want something to go from reasonably wide (10 ish) to reasonably long (120+). Before I had fuji, I had (still got) an 11-22 and an 18-150. Two bodies and I was ready and didn't have to worry about changing lenses in the field.

    Fast Forward to today. I've got the 10-24, the 16-80 and the 70-300. Which is lovely but that's 3 lenses and I've only got two bodies. So, looking around and chatting, I've been "taken" BY THE 18-135. Not heavy and reasonably OK quality, especially for holidays. So, I was able to try one out (thank you Fuji UK) and decided I would see what I could get.

    List price in the UK is £799. I'm not paying that. Currys (a UK electrical distributer) had one for £549. But then I looked at the second hand market and MPB had one that they said was in excellent condition for £429. So, nearly half of the list price. Seemed a worthwile punt.

    So, I did and it arrived on Tuesday. In the evening I went out with it as my only lens to see how I got on with it. And it's not bad. Quality is OK, it fades off at the corners, but I was expecting that. And, of course, the 40mp sensor in my X-T5 shows up the worst of a lens. But for what I bought it for, I think it's OK.

    Here's a few pictures from it. All reduced in size, so I don't take up too much space on here.

    Is it Christmas yet-1920.jpg

    FSCF0047-adj-1920.jpg

    FSCF0045-adj-1920.jpg

    FSCF0032-adj-1920.jpg

    FSCF0026-adj-1920.jpg

    FSCF0010-adj-1920.jpg

    FSCF0004-adj-1920.jpg

    FSCF0002-adj-1920.jpg

    Feel free to comment.

    Alan

    FSCF0032-adj-1920.jpg

    JPG, 487.0 KB, uploaded by AlanSh on Aug. 10, 2023.

    FSCF0045-adj-1920.jpg

    JPG, 227.4 KB, uploaded by AlanSh on Aug. 10, 2023.

    Is it Christmas yet-1920.jpg

    JPG, 225.9 KB, uploaded by AlanSh on Aug. 10, 2023.

    FSCF0026-adj-1920.jpg

    JPG, 338.5 KB, uploaded by AlanSh on Aug. 10, 2023.

    FSCF0047-adj-1920.jpg

    JPG, 246.3 KB, uploaded by AlanSh on Aug. 10, 2023.

    FSCF0010-adj-1920.jpg

    JPG, 146.8 KB, uploaded by AlanSh on Aug. 10, 2023.

    FSCF0004-adj-1920.jpg

    JPG, 348.1 KB, uploaded by AlanSh on Aug. 10, 2023.

    FSCF0002-adj-1920.jpg

    JPG, 188.1 KB, uploaded by AlanSh on Aug. 10, 2023.

  • Members 535 posts
    Aug. 10, 2023, 5:38 p.m.

    Looks good to me Alan. I’ve never used the 18-135 myself, but I have a friend who swears by the lens for his Winter walkabouts in Florida with an Xt4. (As a result, his 100-400 is usually available to me here up North — He’s a few years older than I, and he has declared that lens too heavy for everything except birds from the deck. )

    I still want to add the 10-24 to my own quiver to have the (travel ) Holy Trinity at my disposal — though I’ve been considering the 8mm prime instead. The 150-600 also remains on the wishlist for wildlife vehicle safaris. For my use of an ILC, that lens is arguably a higher priority than wide. Nice to have options.

    Anyhow, congrats on the new glass. I’m looking forward to seeing what you do with the quiver of one.

  • Members 421 posts
    Aug. 10, 2023, 10:49 p.m.

    Congrats from me. I have one somewhere in my closet-full of gear. Used it on my X-T1 years ago. The images are nice and will spurn me to dig through.

    Bob

  • Members 123 posts
    Aug. 10, 2023, 11:38 p.m.

    The 18-120/4 is much more expensive but a bit lighter weight, surprisingly. Then there's the Tamron 18-300. I'll have to decide about this issue soon. X-S20 is back at B&H but I haven't received stock notification.

    camerasize.com/compact/#908.426,908.1058,908.1020,ha,t

  • Aug. 11, 2023, 8:19 a.m.

    I tried the 18-300. Nice lens but the one I had was off centred, so I sent it back.

    Alan