Effect seen…, in other words the effect on the blur. ¯\(ツ)/¯
Effect seen…, in other words the effect on the blur. ¯\(ツ)/¯
@JACS has written: @TomAxford has written:Merriam-Webster online dictionary gives the definition: "the blurred quality or effect seen in the out-of-focus portion of a photograph taken with a narrow depth of field"
or effect..., i.e., the blur itself.
Effect seen, in other words the effect that the blur has on the image. ¯\(ツ)/¯
Unseen effects belong to 3D pop threads. It says nowhere that it is the effect the blur has on the image, it says only where it is seen.
@jaberg has written: @JACS has written: @TomAxford has written:Merriam-Webster online dictionary gives the definition: "the blurred quality or effect seen in the out-of-focus portion of a photograph taken with a narrow depth of field"
or effect..., i.e., the blur itself.
Effect seen, in other words the effect that the blur has on the image. ¯\(ツ)/¯
Unseen effects belong to 3D pop threads. It says nowhere that it is the effect the blur has on the image, it says only where it is seen.
“the blurred quality or effect seen in the out-of-focus portion of a photograph taken with a narrow depth of field"
Edit to add, you are correct that I expressed myself poorly earlier.
@bobn2 has written: @TomAxford has written:I'm glad this discussion has been moved into Beginners' Questions Discussion. Thank you to whoever moved it.
It was me. I split the thread so that the contribution that you made for the information of beginners is still in BQ, but the surrounding discussion is in BQD. That will be the normal practice.
When splitting a thread it would be nice to add a link to the original thread. This thread starts with a post that makes little sense without it. Just a thought.
I just lose interest when the OP can start changing the title of a thread after a response has been made to suit themselves. It's kind of weird.
Danny.
Not to hijack this thread much. I did not look into it much at all. Bor the love of god... Can anyone explain to me what is "toneh"? 🤦
Also, meaning of words changes in time, even the wrong way. There is nothing to do about it, except for finding the new word for the "particularity".
I just lose interest when the OP can start changing the title of a thread after a response has been made to suit themselves. It's kind of weird.
Who is the OP you are referring to?
I was OP of the parent thread in Beginners' Questions, but then bobn2 moved part of it, thus creating this thread with petrochemist being the author of the first post in this new thread. Bobn2 created the name for this thread. I had previously made a fairly minor change to the name of the parent thread after comments and discussion from several contributors. There was nothing weird about it.
@nzmacro has written:I just lose interest when the OP can start changing the title of a thread after a response has been made to suit themselves. It's kind of weird.
Who is the OP you are referring to?
I was OP of the parent thread in Beginners' Questions, but then bobn2 moved part of it, thus creating this thread with petrochemist being the author of the first post in this new thread. Bobn2 created the name for this thread. I had previously made a fairly minor change to the name of the parent thread after comments and discussion from several contributors. There was nothing weird about it.
It's strange you can do it. Try it at DPR. So I just edited my post because...... well I can just like a title 😉
Strange IMO, but there ya go.