• Members 124 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 2:03 p.m.

    An appealing shot, but pay attention to your edges. That stuff is so easy to fix with today's software.

    2024-01-20_09-01-25.png

    2024-01-20_09-01-25.png

    PNG, 1.8 MB, uploaded by FloridaNature on Jan. 20, 2024.

  • Members 828 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 2:11 p.m.

    This one is perfect!

  • Members 828 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 2:13 p.m.
  • Members 828 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 2:14 p.m.

    The first shouldn't work but it does. The lit grasses on the second are important.

  • Members 1514 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 2:18 p.m.

    Lots of atmosphere in this set, but I really like this shot with the food stall.

  • Members 828 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 2:19 p.m.

    I accept the circle comment but the debris? Not so much. I did take plenty where the circle was intact but this had the best wave.

  • Members 828 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 2:25 p.m.

    The last is my pick, beautiful. The horizontal bars tend to crop up a lot in these churches, are they lighting booms or structural supports?

  • Members 1514 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 2:30 p.m.

    May I join in. It is my experience too, that what I think are weaker shots in a set, often added to tell a story, turn out to be the most popular shots in a set. Maybe because they fall outside of my usual compositional practice.

    I am not too keen on cloning out stuff, but I do it occasionally. A couple of shots I made during Covid had all those paper "do not sit here" markers fouling up the shot. So I removed them, in two different locations. I went back the year after and reshot both places as they were nearby. I feel more comfortable with un-cloned shots.

  • Members 1514 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 2:34 p.m.

    Thanks.

    This is an interesting building, which I will explore again when they have finished working inside, as it is quite spectacular inside too.

    The bars are structural, to stop the arches spreading out. An arch has a big horizontal thrust outwards at the base. Gothic flying arches are a much more attractive way of doing things, by taking the horizontal thrusts down to the foundations, if you have the space.

  • Members 124 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 3:23 p.m.

    So, now you have me curious. Why do you think it shouldn't work?

  • Members 124 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 3:30 p.m.

    Of course, you may. I totally understand the aversion to modifying photos. I used to have a more strict view myself. The longer I have engaged in this hobby the more liberal my views have become. I am creating my photos for viewing enjoyment NOT to document how a place looks. The viewer is never gone to know there was a Covid sign there, nor will they care. On the contrary, they will be glad they didn't have the distraction when viewing the photo.

    I do have concerns about the progress in AI, though. I feel like a photo should be MOSTLY real. Your skill and eye when snapping the shutter should matter a lot.

  • Members 828 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 5:04 p.m.

    Commonly, this shot would be approached from a low viewpoint, stretching into the distance. But I like this unusual perspective. I don't like the leaves on the bottom left and, unlike Nigel and Steve, would clone them out in a heartbeat. From my point of view, and it sounds rather grandiose when I say it but I don't mean it to be, I am trying to create art, rather than simply document something. If I like the shot, then I'm happy enough. I'll take on board any feedback but am generally confident in my own judgement nowadays. That doesn't necessarily apply to the stuff that I sell of course.

  • Members 597 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 7:35 p.m.

    Looks lovely in the clean new snow.

  • Members 597 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 7:44 p.m.

    That is a staggering amount of detail. I occasionally wish I had more to call on with my humble Oly, but then I would struggle to carry anything heavier on my mountain hikes. It does have a hi-res mode, but that would require a tripod. I tell myself that when I do my 'art' shots with ICM and multi-exposures, extra resolution becomes superfluous.

  • Members 597 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 7:51 p.m.

    The Natural Landscape Photography Awards run via OnLandscape magazine does something similar.
    www.onlandscape.co.uk/2023/11/natural-landscape-photographer-of-the-year-2023/
    Things are going to get a whole lot more complicated in the near future, given the explosion in AI development.

  • Members 828 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 7:52 p.m.

    [quote="@Vahur"]
    Walk in old town day after snowfall.

    Wrong thread, should go to "Lonely benches" instead?

    Wow - some very pretty images here.
    I like #3 but have to ask for #5, who would sit outside in that weather!?

  • Members 597 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 8 p.m.

    I think we would all agree on that, but the ongoing lack of a threaded format makes it tiresome.
    I have been known to remove rubbish bins and notice boards, but rarely overhead wires. I think I've become more tolerant of them over time 😁 Often things like a spider's web of wires are an important part of the local scene. I don't think I've ever added anything in except in fun.

  • Members 1514 posts
    Jan. 20, 2024, 8:43 p.m.

    Gabriele Basilico a famous Italian Architectural photographer made good use of the spiders web of wires that you see in Italian cities. It sort of marks out his work very often. So I just now tend to accept them in my pictures, along with all the other flotsam and jetsam of modern life.