Ah! So three rows of shots in each. That's a lot of stitching! Also takes a bit of time to take the shots, so beware of movement in the clouds. Well done!
I haven't done any photography for a couple of weeks, mainly due to preoccupation with tasks at the 'new' house. But I have been trying to get my catalogue in order, and found these two images of the Penkiln Burn taken from the same spot. We had a wet summer followed by a fairly dry autumn (contrary to much of the UK), hence the summer shot has more water in the burn than the more recent one.
It is interesting how the same view seen in two different seasons, looks very different. I find the Autumn shot more eye-catching.
Both work but I prefer the first because it doesn't give itself away too quickly. You have to look around the frame and little details pop out. Very nice.
General anesthesia. And because my health care plan has a 25% co-pay on outpatient surgery, I had to pay $2,155 out of my pocket. But at least now I don't have to worry about cancer.
I don't understand the purpose of the "coach". I don't know what you use to post-process but it should be a simple matter to make the person on the right edge go away so it doesn't draw attention away from your subject.
How bizarre. I too had results of a PSA prostate test on Thursday. Thankfully also negative but not before a scare caused by an admin cock-up at my doctor.
The first shot is technically very good but if I'm honest (which I know you prefer), a bit soulless. The second shot has much more impact, I like it a lot. Surprised the lights didn't offer any starbursts though, given you used a relatively small aperture. And I think I'd drop the exposure on the top of the building at the right.