Love both of them for different reasons. That image of wooden structure with metal vents in amazing. And those extremely interesting balconies of what I presume is apartment building are just incredible in their intricate design. Great catch.
FWIW: I could have easily avoided the pole/wires by stepping off the road but its inclusion is deliberate to continue the triangular shapes in a natural frame.
I like that kind of stuff, but realize that tastes may vary.
Sometimes poles and wires are distractions. Sometimes they are compositional elements, as they are here. That is why it is so hard to make "rules" about how photography should be done.
The leading line road leads me to a conical roofed structure that defines where this is. Presumably the road extends left or right, and will eventually take me to the white painted city on the hill, clearly an ancient place with plentiful interesting and historical structures. But at the same time, the cone-topped structure is a blockage, an end point. How to keep up the journey? The triangle formed by the wire and pole form a triangular snapshot of the destination, a magnificent domed structure amid the old city. An interestingly constructed image, kind of like a landscape with a small telescoped portion tucked to one side.
Lovely scene with great colors, and it seems you spotted a wonderful composition with that curving row of huts moving from the right lower corner to the vanishing point on the opposite thirds mark, where it converges with the descending curve from the mountain, sinking in a curve from the upper right edge. The image feels well balanced and the colors are rich without being extreme. Technically, your camera will have captured an image you'll be happier with simply because of the loss of detail/posterization of the sky and parts of the mountain (the tribulations of a phone camera's sensor). Phone captures sometimes won't hold up to the burden of editing and will begin to fall apart much more quickly than a camera capture. You'll have fun with this one when you get home!
Nicely composed image of a lovely scene (nothing nicer than an arched bridge with a reflection surrounded by natural beauty). There are some who will always fuss about the subject being smack in the center, but I think it works quite well here. There is a visual line to follow, guided by light, and there's the two large trees providing balance, and the shapes of the palms providing counterbalance. I'm liking, at least to a point, the creative processing. But, I would probably mitigate the muddy blobs left and right of center in the upper half by tinkering with the overlay's color and intensity using a mask.
At first look, the pole and wire seem to spoil the scene. It pays to look more closely. The road takes the eye to the tulli. Now the viewer can appreciate what the pole and wire are doing visually as the triangular shape is repeated. The downward angle of the wire further ensures the connection is made to the tulli.
additionally, there are a number of smaller verticals that echo the vertical of the distant tower on the right. The triangular framing of the far tower helps bring foreground and background together.
It's a clever shot that succeeds with the aims Roel shared with us.
Interesting architectural images, particularly as a pair, since they are built on the same design motif, a question mark shape. The architecture around the motif is different, and the color use, though if displayed as a pair I do think I'd stick to the same monochrome tones as the second image since it would help connect the two more thoroughly. Both are well composed and well taken technically. More extremity in blacks/whites would make them more striking, especially as a pair, the kind of processing I associate with luminosity masks, which I confess I have never mastered.
Though the scene itself is interesting, the dark dull colors (no doubt caused by an over bright day fooling your sensor) detract from te interesting elements. A slower shutter would have given you truer colors and more detail in the shadows. Sometimes we have to over-rule some of the settings our cameras choose when we know conditions warrant it. I wonder what the automated HDR feature of your camera would have produced? I sometimes try that when in an overbright situation with lots of specular highlights. I set the camera where it creates the auto HDR jpg but also retains the raw files it created the thing from. That way I have several exposure options from which to pick the best to work with. A lazy woman's way of wrangling a difficult scene...
A mountain with presence. It dominates the human structures and their own little peaks. The mountain rules and that's what you have captured.
Your colours help. Some touches of orange stand out but they are overwhelmed by the blue.
I reread what I had written. I didn't mean "overwhelmed by the blue" in a negative way. Simply noting that they are dominated by the mountain.
And what an eye that is! More exotic even than a cormorant's eye! Sharp as a pin too, in your captures.
The first is technically less compelling, since it's apparently a tight crop of a larger image, hampered by the greenery Mr. Anhinga was hiding behind. But those others are magnificently detailed and show off his amazing eye, his fascinating wing-drying position, and all his other intriguing details. I love the ratty gate or fence, with all its attached debris. It lends interest and authenticity to the image beyond a biological portrait. Well done.